ECOS2002

its a compulsory subject for the economics major, which means you have to get it done. Unfortunately it is unbearably boring. The lectures are long and monotonous and graham white is knowledgeable but he can speak for 3 hours straight in the same tone without any breaks and it is hard to keep up / keep interest. The lectures are all really long and unenjoyable. Normally a 2 hour lecture is bearable if they split it into parts but this subject is pretty rough with lectures The tutors are all pretty good and help in understanding the content, and the essay and mid sem are relatively easy to go well in. the actual assessment components of the subject aren't too bad but the content is super boring and difficult to derive all the mathematical equations...

for god sake never ever choose this course taught by Graham White, 2020 s2 is his first time to teach this half-semester. Not only did he have a very boring tone of voice in class, but he also had no primary or secondary. After 15 minutes, he was almost lethargic in his bass, while introducing many complicated and unimportant theories. Understanding these theories will not improve GPA, but it will waste a lot of time. At the same time, the form of the exam focuses on the grasp of language and logic, so that the number of words in the multiple-choice questions is very long, and there is no connection between the options, like doing true or false questions in the abcd option. So for this core course, the performance of white is more suitable for philosophy courses, so I think the school's attempt to arrange the first half of the semester is a failure, and I look forward to Matthew's return in the second half of the semester....

Matthew Smith is a good lecturer who explains the concepts well. However, his reluctance to upload ANY practice papers really made the unit unnecessarily hard. The unit is quite boring as well, but I feel like you have to learn this stuff one way or another....